| 
 
  
 Summer 2005 (13.2)
 Pages
      28-29
 Intellectual Responsibility
 When Silence is Not Golden
 Conversations
      with Mstislav Rostropovich (1927-2007)
 and Galina Vishnevskaya by Claude Samuel
 
 Other articles about
      Rostropovich
 (1) "Rostropovich:
      The Home Museum" by Gulnar Aydamirova. (AI 11.2, Summer
      2003)
 (2) "Rostropovich:
      Happy 75th Birthday. World-Famous Cellist Celebrates in Baku."
      (AI 10.1, Spring 2002)
 (3) "Rostropovich & Galina: Celebrating Their 50th
      Wedding Anniversary" by Betty Blair and Sheyla Heydarova.
      (AI 13.2, Summer 2005)
 (4) "Famous
      People: Then and Now. Mstislav Rostropovich - Cellist and
      Conductor (1927-2007)." (AI 7.4, Winter1999)
 (5) "Rostropovich
      Celebrates 70th Jubilee in Baku." (AI 5.2, Summer 1997)
 (6) "Philharmonic Reopens: Renovation
      of Baku's Prestigious Concert Hall," by Abid Sharifov,
      Deputy Prime Minister. (AI 12.2, Summer 2004).
 
 
 
 Editor: What is
      the responsibility of intellectuals to other artists and thinkers
      whom they know are being repressed by their respective governments
      in other parts of the world? What can they do? What should they
      do? And does it matter?
 
 The following is an excerpt from conversations wtih music critic
      Claude Samuel and world-famous cellist Mstislav Rostropovich
      and his wife, Bolshoi Opera singer Galina Vishnevskaya. Rostropovich
      was born in Baku. The home in which he was born was recently
      converted into a home museum and the street named after father
      and son cellists - Leopold and Mstislav.
 
 The observations about how intellectuals should be active grew
      out of their own personal experience in assisting Russian composers
      Prokofiev and Shostakovich whose works were censured for a period
      of time under the restrictive Soviet regime. But then the spotlight
      was turned on Rostropovich and Galina themselves in 1970 when
      they befriended dissident writer Alexander Solshenitsyn (author
      of "One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich" and later
      the three volume "Gulag Archipelago" describing the
      horrors of the prison camps in Siberia, which he himself had
      survived and had lived to tell the story).
 
 
   Left: Mstislav Rostropovich, World renown
      cellist, painted by Tahir Salahov. On display in Baku at the
      Rostropovich Home Museum in Baku, where the musician was born. 
 Rostropovich invited the writer and his family to spend the winter
      at his dacha outside of Moscow, as he had no place to live. Then
      the musician wrote an Open Letter in support of the maligned
      writer. But his humanitarian gesture brought on retaliation.
      Soviet authorities turned the spotlight on the musicians and
      revoked their citizenship and stripped them of all the music
      honors and privileges while they were on a two-year tour in the
      United States. This meant the Lenin and Stalin medals, which
      were the ultimate awards bestowed in the Soviet Union by some
      of the most respected and highly qualified musicians and music
      critics in the world. It's an understatement to say that Rostropovich
      and Galina were shocked by the decision.
 
 Here, Galina and Rostropovich with French journalist and renowned
      music critic Claude Samuel discuss the responsibility of artists
      and intellectuals when they learn that fellow artists are being
      repressed by their governments. Although the conversation took
      place in 1983, it is as relevant today as it was back then. The
      silence and passiveness that Rostropovich speaks of during the
      Soviet period, is no less pervasive and tangible today, and not
      just in the republics of the former Soviet Union. Their words
      offer a challenge to Western artists and intellectuals.
 
 The following excerpt is from the book: "Mstislav Rostropovich
      and Galina Vishnevskaya - Russia, Music and Liberty.
 
 Conversations with Claude Samuel." Pages 122-126. See book
      cover, opposite page.
 Samuel: What
      is the responsibility of intellectuals to their fellow artists
      in other parts of the world who are being repressed?
 Galina: An artist living in a totalitarian country can do nothing
      or - as you well know - he will be immediately arrested. Sakharov
      went on a hunger strike, but do we have the right to demand such
      heroism of everyone? On the other hand, an artist who lives in
      the free world cannot compromise. He has all the power and, therefore,
      the obligation to speak, to express his opinions, and to protest.
 
 Below:
      Russian
      dissident writer Alexander Solzhenitsyn with his wife and Galina
      (left) in Washington DC, 1995. It was because Rostropovich befriended
      the writer that he and Galina were stripped of their own citizenship
      and superlative music awards.
 
 
   Rostropovich:
      I have another question to pose. Sakharov went on a hunger strike
      because Lise, his future daughter-in-law, couldn't join her fiancé
      who had already defected to the West. Now, nobody in the Soviet
      Union needed Lise. One more or one less Lise among 260 million
      inhabitants: of what importance could it be? Everybody can understand
      that - above all, Sakharov's two hundred academic colleagues,
      who were cultivated men and great scholars. 
 But I would like to know who among them stood up to defend Sakharov,
      their colleague, who was on the brink of the abyss. Not that
      they would have spared their gold to erect a monument to his
      glory. But they never had occasion to spend it. No one stood
      up, though everyone knew that Sakharov was right. In the Soviet
      Union, everyone understands that.
 
 Galina: When I was living in the Soviet Union, I already thought,
      and I think more than ever today, that the academicians and scholars
      should have assembled and marched down the street together shouting,
      "Enough of this tyranny!" They wouldn't have been shot!
 
 Samuel: Why didn't they do it?
 
 Galina: Because they were afraid! They're afraid in different
      ways. One is afraid he won't be able to get permission for his
      next trip abroad, another is afraid he won't get his raise...
 
 Rostropovich: ...and someone else has a son finishing his secondary
      schooling who would like to enter the university...
 
 
   Left: Available for purchase on the Internet:
      "Mstislav Rostropovich and Galina Vishnevskaya-Russia, Music
      and Liberty. Conversations with Claude Samuel." Reinhard
      G. Pauly, General Editor. Amadeus Press: Portland, Oregon 1995,
      223 pages. ISBN 0-931340-76-4. Translated from French by E. Thomas
      Glasow. Copyright 1983 as "Entretiens avec Mstislav Rostropovitch
      et Galina Viechnevskaia" by Editions Robert Laffont, Paris.
      AI: Highly recommended. Lively and Insightful. 
 Galina: Yes, what do they fear? Petty things! Under the system,
      people have become so small-minded that all ethical behavior
      has been eradicated. Their only concern is getting a better loaf
      of bread than their neighbor's, gaining access to a store that
      is closed to other people, and buying a piece of sausage there
      while the neighbor has to wait five hours in line for the same
      amount of sausage! That's how they live, and that's why they
      haven't denounced the injustice.
 
 Samuel: What a great victory for the Soviet regime: the intellectuals
      are reduced to silence!
 
 Rostropovich: It must be said that it was accomplished at the
      cost of tens of millions of human lives!
 
 Galina: Millions of people who were physically exterminated,
      and others whose spiritual existence was stifled.
 Samuel: As for the silence of the composers...
 
 Rostropovich: The composers? Do you think my great friend Shostakovich
      who wrote some works especially for me, my close friend Khachaturian,
      or a composer like Kabalevsky didn't know what I was going through
      when I was being persecuted? They knew! Shostakovich and Khachaturian
      saw me weeping several times. Couldn't they all have gone together
      to see the members of the government, to tell them, "You
      know, Rostropovich is an artist who can still serve Soviet music;
      he can be of great musical use to us, so don't dismiss him! He
      has numerous students, and you're apt to weaken our cello program
      - "?
 
 None of them tried that approach because if they had stepped
      forward, Brezhnev would have raised his eyebrow and, with one
      eye shut, would have murmured, "Yes, he might not be a bad
      musician, but he isn't on our side! How could you think of pleading
      his case? How could you make such a mistake?"
 
 Galina: And, the following year, as a result of their behavior
      in the matter, one of them might not receive the Lenin Prize!
 
 Rostropovich: However strongly Galina and I describe the situation
      to you, we really feel it's difficult to explain it all to you
      in words. But when you live over there, when it's your skin on
      the line, it's a different matter!
 
 Galina: Future generations will be appalled by the Soviet regime's
      misdeeds, but won't they be even more appalled at the silence
      of the free world? Here, anything is possible. Mouths, ears,
      and eyes are open, but the people don't want to understand what's
      happening over there. They don't want to. And that's an international
      refusal. You can scream all you want, they plug their ears. When
      you tell them, "Look, I'm bleeding, I'm being skinned alive!"
      they answer, "No, it isn't true!"
 
 Samuel: What can someone who is a Soviet dissident do in the
      West?
 
 Rostropovich: My duty is to explain what I know, honestly, everywhere,
      to tell what I myself have endured.
 
 Galina: And if we don't use this opportunity, it's a crime against
      all those who remain over there.
 
 Rostropovich: If we had come to the West as Soviet artists on
      tour, we wouldn't have been able to say half of one word of what
      we are saying today. Because we would have left our children
      over there, and we know very well that half a word would have
      been enough: from the moment we returned to Russia, our lives
      would have been over. I understand all the Soviet artists who
      remain silent. If I were still a Soviet artist, I would be silent
      too. We all kept quiet.
 
 Samuel: Today [1983], on the contrary, one of your ambitions
      is to put pressure on Western governments.
 
 Galina: We tell the stories, we speak of everything that we endured,
      everything we know, and the people themselves must draw their
      own conclusions.
 
 Rostropovich: We're not trying to tell anyone what to do, whether
      they are our friends, or kings, or presidents.
 Galina: But when people question us, we tell the truth.
 
 Samuel: Don't you think that the silence of the West might be
      justified by the necessity of peaceful world coexistence? Being
      silent - to live in peace?
 
 Galina: That was already done under Hitler, and that was enough!
      That method had been tried. Now maybe we should try another approach:
      force or disobedience!
 
 
 Back to Index AI 13.2 (Summer
      2005)
 AI Home
      | Search | Magazine
      Choice
      | Topics
      | AI Store | Contact us
 
 Other Web sites
      created by Azerbaijan International
 AZgallery.org | AZERI.org | HAJIBEYOV.com
 |